2 Responses to “The need for non-monarchial language for God”
-
On October 9th, 2009 at 6:01 pm highpastor said:
Does this mean that http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYAXGvev4dM&feature=related is a good insight into the nature of God. (At least if they never sang "he's")If so I am struggling.
-
On October 10th, 2009 at 9:43 am PeterR said:
Ian, I like lots of what you say here. Arabic has a useful version of superlative, intensive, which is used for God, which is roughly the same as "incomparably" – not "biggest" because that implies that God is somehow comparable, whereas God is beyond that comparison – and yet allows us to attribute qualities to God which operate within our language."Big" is fine for many purposes. However, "Lord" – which of course had other resonances in other times – does capture one thought which we do well not to lose. That is the sense that God is to be obeyed, in that God's will is to be followed when it cuts across our own will. That sense of obedience may not be convenient or fashionable (it's certainly counter-cultural and departs from the consumer model of faith-flitting), but it seems to be at the core of a deeper prayer life. I'm not sure that "Big" captures that aspect.


